APC · Adaptive Pressure Calibration
Most capable people who underperform aren’t broken — they’re a Hunter in a Farmer’s seat (or the reverse), or they’re being managed against their nature instead of with it. APC reads that, blind.
Pegs and holes.
The right person, in the right-shaped role, managed the right way. The peg is the person’s natural pattern; the hole is the role you’ve put them in; the hammer is how their manager manages them under pressure. Put the wrong peg in the wrong hole and swing the wrong hammer, and you spend years wondering why someone who looks good on paper keeps underdelivering.
A short, blind calibration — the questions never say “Hunter” or “Farmer”, so no one games it.
Grounded in thirty years of behavioural work, and checked against established psychology measures (locus of control; the compass of shame). Not a personality quiz — a read of pressure behaviour.
The instrument is built and running in private calibration. Before it opens publicly it needs one thing: validation against real professionals, in real teams. That’s what the beta is for.
| Phase | Who | Effort | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · tune | ~8 people, blind | ~10 min each, own phones; you pre-rate each in seconds | first picture; we refine the instrument |
| 2 · signal | ~20 people | same | the real read |
| Deliver | — | — | your audited, person-by-person rubric |
First picture wrapped up inside about nine days. Nothing onerous, nothing clinical, no one labelled, not a hiring gate — a calibration to see your team more clearly.
The honest exchange: your people help calibrate the instrument against real professionals — the validation the work needs before launch. In return, you get the full rubric, and you’re a founding reference.